1950s Concepts
 
 
learning how to design
 
 

The sketch, used for the masthead, was drawn in 1973 as a retrospective exercise. It is typical of several designs I produced in the 1950s period. The site is Southern California cliffs dropping to an ocean beach. The building method is gunite which I explored in several theoretical works and two actual, unbuilt, commissions.

 

In 1960, I spent a summer supervising a gunite construction crew to gain hands on experience with the material. I produced several innovations with the technique which lead to my first offer of a Partnership in an architectural firm. The idea was to use precast pieces, as “forms,” and shoot the gunite to them. This way precision edges can be accomplished while taking advantage of the superior materials-handling and “free-form” attributes of sprayed gunite.

 

Unfortunately, to this day this method remains unexploded. However, the idea of combining shop built precision components with built-in-place field work has been employed by me several times - most recently with the soffits of the Hilton Head KnOwhere Store. The Bay Area Studio [link: bay area studio] will employ this technique in wood.

 

My stepfather was assigned to the Pentagon in 1949 so we moved to Falls Church, Virginia that Fall. The general environment of Washington D.C. stimulated my slowly growing interest in architecture. One of my favorite places today, to go sit and think, is the Rotunda and fountain-rooms of the old National Gallery off the Mall [link: national art gallery - february 2005]. Even though I have never worked in the classical idiom, It is interesting (and enlightening) that one of the most influential buildings, that had great impact on my subsequent work, was done in the “Federal Style.” My parents gave me a drawing board and tools [link: matt history 1949], along with some mechanical drawing manuals, and turned me loose. I taught myself to draw. From that time on I was never without a drawing board by my side and always had a conceptual project in progress. In 1955, I took a high school extension course in drafting and found out that I had covered the equivalent of several semesters of the subject on my own. By the time I started working professionally in June of 1956 [link: the promise - 1956], this was - and remains - my only formal training in architecture.

 
This design period lasted until I moved to New York in 1961 and started my work in field engineering and construction management. Most of the actual work that I did, from 1956 through 1961 was work in other architect’s offices. My personal learning process and the development of my own architectural “voice” was facilitated by a few conceptual projects and eight commissions - seven that remained un-built. My first commission was built, without my supervision, a few years after I designed it in 1953. It still stands, today, about a mile away and 47 years distant from the Palo Alto KnOwhere Store which I designed in 1996 and built in 1997.
 
Eight comissioned projects I learned my architectural “basics” on:
 
1953 The Nichols House
1955 Parking for Marin County Apartments
1956 Swimming Pool Equipment Building
1957 Bryant Street Studio
1958 Coffee Creek Ranch Guest House (with Jack Rapp)
1960 Hoover House
1960 American Pool Building
1960 Cooper House [link: cooper house]
 
 

Seven conceptual projects supplemented this process:

 
1951 Architect’s Office
1953 The Nichols House
1956 Transportation System
1956 Apartment Buildings [link: san francisco vertical housing]
1958 Taliesin Studio
1958 Cicular Hillside House
1958 Hiliside City
1958 Architect’s Home and Studio
 
 

These projects covered a wide range of problems, materials and modular forms. They spanned the period from my own nascent thoughts through my first four jobs in architecture, my time with Frank Lloyd Wright and my seminal week with Bruce Goff.

 

As can be seen, I did not pursue a great many different projects in these beginning years but worked - and reworked - a few sketches over and over. Each explored different basic ideas and each presented a different set of challenges to my evolving sense of architectural grammar. This body of work, in addition to articulating my own architectural viewpoints, became the medium by with I developed ideas and lesions I learned from those who taught and influenced me during this period: Wright, Goff, Schindler, McCallester, Maybeck, Drake, et.al. These sketches are long gone - yellowed and torn, ultimately lost. I will reproduce them here as a documentation and history of my seminal learning path and note what problems were being “worked” and what influences I felt in each work. In a certain sense I am still reworking these projects - there is much left to explore in them and I consider several of them buildable to this day.

 

At the end of this period, I felt myself to be a competent designer - in other words, I could conceive a building in my head clearly and expect no surprises when it was built - it was the building process, itself, that I took on as my main focus throughout the 60s.

 
Predominately, in this period, my focus was on domestic work - I considered this (and still do) to be one of the most challenging of architectural assignments. To this day, great architecture has not been made accessible or affordable to the average income family. When you consider the energy and ecological impacts of our housing systems, there is little affordable, sustainable housing in existence for anyone no matter the budget or requirements of the owners.
 
 
 
Of all these projects, it is the Cooper House that constituted my most mature effort and seminal statement of domestic architecture. The concept of life style, the way that the plan facilitates this concept, the integration of the building method to the idea of the building and the landscape for which it was conceived, is an accomplishment which, today 46 years later [2006], gives me great satisfaction. I started reworking this design in 1998 and it is notable that in December of 2005 I received an enquiry as to its possible adaptation to a site in the Virgin Islands.
 
I was intensely studying construction when I designed the Cooper House. During this period I was working for developers and learning “production housing” methods. As noted, I worked for a swimming pool company to learn gunite methods and also design a display and office build for them. It was these works that motivated me to move to New York and get directly into construction. This phase dominated my next ten years. It is this material focus and tight integration of form and building methods that makes the Cooper house such a visceral design. This sense will permeate the structure when build. In a way this is a building that only a young person would design but it may well take the experience of someone older to render it and make it real.
 
My 60s projects are full of ideas that can be successfully built today. They constitute a legacy of old and new opportunities. They are “old” in that buildings are rarely, at least in the U.S. today, built in so physical and authentic manner and “new” because there remain a number of architectural concepts that have not yet been successfully or frequently employed.
 
 

Matt Taylor
March 6, 1999
Palo Alto, California

 

SolutionBox voice of this document:
VISION • STRATEGY • EVALUATE

 

posted March 6, 1998

Revised: January 22, 2006
• 19880306.181950.mt • 20000709.466791.mt •
• 20060122.911022.mt •

note: this document is about 25% finished

Copyright® Matt Taylor 1960, 1999, 2000, 2006

me@matttaylor.com

 

 

Search For:
Match:  Any word All words Exact phrase
Sound-alike matching
Dated:
From: ,
To: ,
Within: 
Show:   results   summaries
Sort by: