From the beginning in the mid 70s, when we conceived MG Taylor, one
of the basic assumptions [link] of
our way-of-working was and remains that the network [link] organization
and economy is fundamentally
superior to existing organizational structures and processes. [link] For
this reason, NavCenters are designed to facilitate
complex [link] networks
- not just single organizations - and, in turn, they
require the resources of a network to
remain viable. [link] We
call these network architectures ValueWebs. A ValueWeb
is both structured [link] and
emergent [link] in
it’s behavior. It is highly adaptable and always changing. The process of a ValueWeb is heuristic and is held together by an armature of practice principles, rules-of-engagement and common goals while encouraging the greatest diversity possible within a fundamental unity. In this way, ValueWebs are mind-like in how they function. [link] |
By mid 2003 there were 27 plus environments
around the world which delivered MG Taylor work processes. By early 2010 alone, there were 15 environments in production at the AI Shop. Some of these are event focused spaces and some are designed to be full up navCenter environments able to support the entire Taylor Method.
We expect the number and rate of production of navCenters to multiply over the next few
years. Our goal [link] has
been, since the beginning of our enterprise, to build
a distributed network of environments, which make a critical mass, capable of
supporting a new way of working which facilitates the transformation
of individuals and organizations. The objective is
ubiquity of this new, systemic and transformational way of working. Today, the work
of most of these Centers is focused on their
owner
enterprise. This is one level of recursion; it is
where the process most begin. We expect future work to progressively
shift from exclusively a focus on these individual enterprises to their ValueWeb and, ultimately
- within a global context - to the economic
bio region
of which they are a part.
It is at this scale that a new set of critical and
presently unattended problems and opportunities can
be found. I call these “worthy problems.” A WorthyProblem™ is solvable on a local scale and also globally. Thus, by attending to the local you are attending to the global aspects of the problem. A problem in this sense describes the preferred end state, the present conditions (which many think is the problem) the bocks to success and the design strategy to get the vision built. Thus, it is solvable, useful when solved and, if it is a worthy Problem, addresses the systemic as well as the local aspects of the task. I have
my own list [link] of
what these might be. Your list may be different.
It does not matter whose list it is as long
as
we start
to recreate our future simultaneously at all these nested scales. Otherwise, we
“design” our future by default and generate ever more unintended consequences. [link] |
No
single enterprise has the resources to deal with
all the issues they face. Today, very large enterprises
are failing under the weight of their own complexity and as the consequence of their isolation.
Networks of enterprises are far more likely to accomplish
requisite
variety [link] with
their environment. The right balance between variety,
complexity, human scale, global scope, order and
emergent properties can be designed into a ValueWeb
architecture
which employs
a PatchWorks [link] organizational structure and process.
At this scale and scope, NavCenters function as nodes in the
network made
up of patches [link] of
various kinds. This organizational pattern language
[link],
is inherently capable of both extreme flexibility
and sustained organizational continuity. It both adapts to its environment and changes its environment. |
|
Matt
Taylor
March 28, 2001
Palo Alto
SolutionBox
voice of this document:
INSIGHT POLICY PROGRAM
|
posted:
March 28, 2001
revised:
September 11, 2010
200103128.44752.mt 20030518.00993.mt
Copyright© Matt
Taylor 2001, 2002, 2003, 2010
|
|
|