return to SDC HOME

SDC Campus

Elements For an Intergrated
Architectural Grammar

 

What follows is a formal criticism of the existing structures. The purpose of this is to create a conceptual framework that enables a viable design approach to the project. The bridge between and IDEA of a building and the physical execution of a concrete design is the grammar in which we subsequently render the design. Even though there will always be aspects that are general to a number of projects, a properly formulated grammar is specific and unique to each project. It is the language with which the building speaks. An effective grammar has to be buildable. It must not only solve design problems, it must successfully address fabrication and construction ones as well. Grammar is the means by which an idea become alive in a real environment.

 

Grammar is closely related to BRAND. It is the most tangible thing that people see. It delivers the THEME of the project.

 

 

 

Critique of the Existing Site and Buildings:

The orientation of the existing structures is East-West with the main entry facing N. Central Avenue. Today, the north side of the Campus will be perceived by the public as the “front.” What exists now, facing Orleans Street behind an asphalt parking area of no distinction, is plain brick masses - the utilitarian “back” of the old school. This orientation issue has to be solved.

There are four buildings on and around the site all of different eras and architectural styles. There is a wide range in their quality and “fitness” for modern use. Two of these, the Baltimore Schoolhouse Apartments and the Burger King property are derelict in their appearance. All four of these buildings have to be incorporated into an “armature” that will bring harmony to the whole and enhance the sense of “Campus.” The interface with newer building to the south has to be accomplished but this is an easier matter.

Traffic will come down Orleans Street and turn on N. Central Avenue or Aisquith Streets and then find the way into the two parking areas. This process lacks clarity. A logical flow has to be worked out and appropriate signage provided.

Presently, almost the entire 2.9 acres and most of the property around it is covered with concrete and asphalt. The buildings are fairly massive and faced with masonry. This presents a hard and unforgiving appearance devoid of nature.

The development of walls, gates, extensive parameter landscaping and densely landscaped courtyards will create a cloistered feeing and at the same time a greater sense of space. The newer architecture that is introduced will employ a masonry base to integrate with the existing building but will have a much lither structure and many transparent and translucent elements. This “lighter” tough and the introduction of design elements rich in “prospect” and “Refuge” will softer the exterior appearance and establish a natural landscape that can be enjoyed from within and without the structures.

 

Creation of an Integrated Grammar:

Locate th

 

Specific Problems and Solutions:

Locate th

 

Design Elements:

Locate th

 

 

 

 

Building Sequence :

Secure Site

Remove all unnecessary debris

Demo all possible areas For Phase I

Basic finishes: paint, floor covering (rubber, cork) electrical, ceilings, plumbing, HVAC, windows, etc.

Cascading FasTracking sequential finish process - incremental move in.

Post move in Projects - change in work modality.

 

 

 

 

Phase Ib - Post Move-In

 

 

Matt Taylor
May 25, 2002
Palo Alto

 

SolutionBox voice of this document:
VISION • STRATEGY • DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

 



posted: May 25, 2002


revised: April 26, 2003
• 20020525.02761.mt • 20020529.116198.mt •
• 20030426>672298.mt •

Note: this document is 1% complete
Copyright© Matt Taylor 2002, 2003