Hand
Drawn Notebook Pages |
| In
parallel with these web pages, I have been making
entries, related to the
postUsonian project, in my hand drawn Notebooks.
These are listed below. The concept that I will develop
as
a candidate
for UsonianOne came into focus in these pages. It
is far easier to design with a site in mind so I
stared with the Elsewhere property [link].
Page 489, which contains the first sketch of an Elsewhere-postUsonian
solution, is accordingly, used as the masthead for
this URL. In actuality, as I develop the plans
further to meet
my mid
September objective [link],
I intend to use the Tillers [link] Project
land as the site.
This is an ideal location for a postUsonian for historical,
and regional reasons and because of the project,
itself, that the Tillers organization has taken on [link]. |
| The
concept that has evolved is not the only way to meet
the postUsonian criteria that I have established.
It is also on the upper end of complexity and most
likely
-
at least at first - too costly for the majority of
buyers. Once the complexity and manufacturing issues
are solved, however, this design approach may actually
yield complexity-cost reduction benefits. Even as
a prototype, it can deliver many benefits and
lead to environments
that will be highly adaptable to a variety of sites
and situations. It is, essentially, a suspended boat
hull cantilevered above the ground. This structural
schema has many advantages and the resulting configuration
is tightly integrated: form, structure, utility,
finish are one to a degree usually only accomplished
in vehicles and industrial products not architecture
that can be owner field built as well as shop manufactured.
Spaces, with this concept, are adaptable to a variety
of different uses that can cover the full range of
family and home office demands. |
| Schemas,
both more “traditional” and “advanced” in their footprint
and structural/mechanical configuration will have
to explored in order to investigate the full range
of the postUsonian potential. It is expected that
these different approaches will inform on another
and also lead to interesting combinations. This will
be possible because of the unity of philosophy, Pattern
language principles and key grammatical elements
that make the core of the project. Scott Arenz and
Matt Fulvio are also developing their own designs
with
this deadline in mind. This approach is expected
to generate a greater degree of variety than would
otherwise result if this project was initially approached
through the narrower lens of one design. After
September, we will most like pick on or some combination
and pursue a single design to get to prototype. |
computer_hand_work_differences |
It
is interesting to note the different character
of documentation between the web site and hand
drawn
Notebooks. Different kinds of ideas come “out”
in a different way in these two media. This is
a factor
of the media itself and my habits in regard when
I use one or the other. Computers, as portable and
easy to use as they have become, require the organization
of batteries, cords and still require a work surface
of some size. A hand drawn notebook is much more
portable and and can be picked up and put down
much easier. It is a far more tactile media. Graphics
and sketches are easier. The physical mechanics
of making are very different between hand and electronic.
This means that the thought processes are different
with each having intrinsic advantages and disadvantages.
A hand process “draws”
ideas
out
at
a different
rate and in a
different way. I use it more when traveling, in
waiting rooms, at
restaurant
and
when sitting
in
bed although
I use
the laptop
with these environments as well. The context set
by these environments, and the time of day associated
with their use, brings a different mental set to
bear on the work. Their ambiance and the fact they
range from public to private brings different nuances
to bear. All this will show up in the work. The computer,
also, has advantages. Posting to the web or transferring
a document is much quicker and far less labor intensive.
Many software tools can be brought into play much
faster. The migration to a final document is faster.
It can be added to, corrected and modified. These
factor, also, are not neutral but effect the way
work is approached. |
| The
hand drawn pages below are listed in reverse chronological
order so that the story is told “backwards.” |
|
 |
515
08/16/04
postUsonian
Project
UsonianOne Design
Elsewhere
Tillers
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
496
06/27/04
Elsewhere
postUsonian Deadline
Economics of Building
Studio: Two Years
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
491
06/11/04
postUsonian
Key Factors
Primary Message
“Middle Class”
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
490
06/07/04
UsonianOne
Elsewhere Studio
EarthShip
Section Grammar
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
489
06/05/04
postUsonian
UsonianOne
Elsewhere Studio
EarthShip
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
487
05/20/04
postUsonian
Key Elements
Recursion Levels
Earth as ART
link:
full screen view
|
|
 |
484
05/05/04
UsonianOne
Concept
21st Century Worker
Architecture as ART
link:
full screen view
|
|
[not yet scanned] |
363
04/08/03
Usonian
House
Factors
Realization Process
Rules of Engagement
link:
full screen view
|
|
|
|
| Return
To postUsonian Project Index |
|
|
|
|
| Return
To post Usonian Prototypes |
|
|
|
|
| Return
To Hand Notebook INDEX |
|
|
|
| Matt
Taylor
Chicago
August 28, 2004
|

SolutionBox
voice of this document:
VISION PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM
|
August
28,
2004
revised
August 29, 2004
• 20040828.512312.mt • 20040829.650120.mt
•
(note:
this document is about 60% finished)
Matt
Taylor 615 525 7053
me@matttaylor.com
Copyright© Matt
Taylor 2003, 2004
|
|
|