The Flaw In the American Myth
rewriting the script
 
 
This is an essay on North American icons and myths. This Pogo quotation - one of the most familiar icons of the 20th Century - with Pogo contemplating the Earth and moon from space - is an appropriate masthead for this exercise. The NASA images of the Earth and moon are equally provocative - together, they frame a question: will we, as a species, take responsibility for our actions? And, they state a premise. The answer is no if we do not rewrite the myths that define us as a culture. The Human race is becoming increasingly dangerous to itself and to most of the other life forms on this planet. We have created a pattern of development and a set of tools [link: the monkey’s paw] which are getting out of control. Our carelessness is a factor of our self-image which is a consequence of our own self-programming through our use of media. Our failure to realize this and respond appropriately is a failure to understand how humans, as individuals and as groups, respond to stimulus and process information. It is not so much our flaws that are causing this situation. It is our successes combined with the feedback from our own works - to which we remain blind of their full implications - that is pushing us down a path that we do not understand, soon will not be able to control - this is propelling us to a profound crises.
 
Media, advertising, humor and movies are major factors in the making and reinforcement of the North American Myth - they report it, reflect it and, in part, create it. Their study reveals an amazing number of contradictions. These forms “work” only because there exists a commonly held social understanding of the basis for good. Sitcoms, movies and comedy shows are structures - they rely heavily on social consensus. We know who the good guy is. We know who is being the bureaucratic jerk. We know who is getting cheated. These is little mystery in these judgements. Even the humor would not be “funny” if this social ground did not exist. Yet, in so many ways, in our everyday lives, we act out the games that in our entertainment we reject or at least know to be wrong or foolish. I asked the question a number of years ago [link: So how is it we know?], WHY? - and the answer still remains elusive. I will explore this issue in some depth, below.
 
That this Paper was posted on September 11, 2005 - the four year anniversary of 9/11 - is not without some poignancy. It will enable me to express what I have been saying about that event, and our relationship to it, with more clarity. I started writing about 9/11 as soon as it happened. I never finished the articles and designs related to it. I was clear on what I wanted to say. Even though this web site is not in the main stream of American debate, and even though I am not shy of controversy - after all, I am a professional change agent - I just ran out of gas. It was like talking to a wall - or a vacuum. The MYTH was too strong. There was no questioning the formula: “we stand for the good therefore anything and everything we do is good.” “People attack us because we are good and because we are successful and because they are jealous and bad.” The fact that there is a great deal of truth in this actually makes it a far more dangerous meme than if it was a total lie. If we do not alter our course, in time it will become a total lie.
 
Although the American Myth evolves over time, certain core elements remain constant. These constant themes make up a powerful meta-programming [rbtfBook: programming and meta programming in the human bio computer] tool. It is important to understand the command language embedded within these themes if we are to understand how we collectively employ media to program ourselves and our society.
 

To establish a basis for my critic of the American Myth, I will illustrate several examples. Each of these are variations on a central set of themes. These themes are constant in our society even with their embedded contradictions. To a great extent, it is the contradictions that determine, more than anything else, our actions as a nation state. Together, these several myth elements combine to make the American Myth - a rich soup of competing icons that drives the ambiguous, passive-aggressive reality of our daily life and our exercise of political, economic, military power and contempt for planet Earth much of its plant and animal life and many of our fellow human beings. Of course, we do not think of us having this attitude and disposition. That also is a consequence of our myth. The difference between a terrorists and a freedom fighters is often which side they are on and who wins and consequently writes the history. We condemn genocide, as we should, but deny our own history [link]. The considerable good that we have done in the world is not nullified by the facts of our darker side nor does it excuse them. We tend to flip back and forth between genuine benevolence and over reactive violence. This must make us a very scary neighbor indeed.

 
In an, I hope not futile, attempt to ward off blind knee jerk reactions to my examples, I have to ask you to accept the following: it is not my intention to attack the subjects of the myths nor necessarily the beliefs on which they rest. As example, in the Jesus Myth, I am not attacking Jesus nor the the Christian religion any more than with the High Noon Myth am I attacking Gary Cooper and the movie which happens to be one of my favorites. In the Heart Burn Myth, I am not making a medical statement nor commenting on the legitimate uses of a drug. This is not my role. I am pointing out that these myths exist and that they have enormous influence. It is how these myths are used, how they add up to program a society and their relationship to the actions we individually and collectively take - that is my focus. It is the consequences of theses actions on each of us, on life in general and therefore our impact on the world which I bring into question. In my use of the work MYTH, I am not commenting on the truth or non truth of the many aspects that make up any particular myth. I use myth here in the sense of a story that embodies key memes that are taken as powerful “truths” and therefore are deeply embedded driving forces of a society. The actual “truth” or not of these is not my point and is immaterial to my thesis. Individual myths, innocent in themselves, interact and combine to create a far different story then they do alone. Because these myths are core to our society, any criticism of them will be too often interpreted as a personal and wholesale assault on certain people and their beliefs. This is why these myths usually remain unexamined. After all, they define who we are and they work in so many practical ways. It is dangerous to leave them unexamined. One of the measures of a viable society is its ability to periodically examine its most cherished memes and determine if they are still taking that society in the direction both desired and viable. It takes courage to recreate one’s myths and oneself. This necessity and opportunity is the whole point of this Paper.
 
The defining MYTH elements
 
The High Noon Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
 
The Ali Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
 
The Alamo Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
 
The Christ Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
 
The Einstein Myth tells the following story:
 
 
The countervailing MYTH elements
 
 
The heart burn Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
The 9/11 Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
The conformity Myth tells the following story:
 
 
 
The hostel nature Myth tells the following story:
 
The AMERICAN MYTH
 
These myth elements combine to make a powerful and compelling (North) American Myth. The Myth is...
 
The Distortion of the AMERICAN MYTH
 
Social Myths run their course. The lose fitness with the world of which they are a part. Doing so they become irrelevant and sometime dangerous. This is our circumstance today. We see ourselves as a curious mixture of self reliant hero, enforcer of the truth, and victim. This is one reason why our foreign policy is so passive-aggressive. One minute indulgent and supporter of the world, another ready to fight and apply great destructive force, all the while looking for the deal to exploit in the situation. We are good and pure - by definition. We are supporting freedom - by definition. The American people believing one thing; their government doing another in their name while special interests thrive. The greatest war budget in the world in the name of defense.
 
Rewriting the Script
 
It is time to assess. Time to examine the foundations of our story. Time to ask if this story is programming us to go where we truly which to go. Time to rewrite it, and in doing so, to recreate ourselves and our society.
 
How do we do this? It starts with understanding the power of myth. It starts with not reversing the causality of our myths. Our myths so lead, demand, guide. They should be a statement of what we want to be - what we strive for. They can cannot be degenerated by serving as a substitute for right action. We cannot say that we have stood for and fought for freedom and, therefore everything we do, in the name of freedom, is freedom. This perverts the concept and leads us down a dangerous path. It is the path of self disillusion. The path of imperialism and fascism. We cannot say that we have been the leading economy, the most inventive economy and therefore others could not possibly compete with us. This leads us down the path of self-satisfaction, sloth and self-denial. Ultimately, we will become second rate. We have more than a toe in this water now.
 
 
Return to INDEX
GoTo: INDEX - Matt Taylor Papers
GoTo: A Small Question
 
Matt Taylor
Nashville
September 11, 2005
 

 

SolutionBox voice of this document:
INSIGHT • POLICY • PROGRAM

 

 

posted: September 11, 2005

revised: October 3, 2005
• 20050911.300110.mt
• 20050912.459900.mt •
• 20050927.987612.mt • 20051005.999900.mt •

(note: this document is about 15% finished)

Copyright© Matt Taylor 2005