evolution
1989 - 2004:
from
Captital Holding to Vanderbilt
to Master’s to RDS |
| There
are
more than 15 years between the concept of the POD and
Armature system and what will be its full realization in a
built project. In many respects this seems like a
long time. Yet, now that were are getting some environments
built with full Armatures, two things become apparent:
first, how radical the Armature concept really is
and second, how much most people like the result.
In fact, there is has been great enthusiasm expressed
for these environments. |
| The
enthusiasm for the completed results coupled with
the still existing resistance to investing in Armature
remains a mystery. The work environment is still
in the grip of utilitarianism. This misapplication
of the concept practical convinces people that the
environment does not “matter” (if you will forgive
the pun) and that it has no relationship to human
health and productivity. Therefore, plane workspaces
with little amenity, glaring lights, no
prospect and refuge - in sum, no organic quality - is practical. |
| Of
course, I reject this approach to environment making
[link].
I do not believe it is practical nor economical to
ask people to work in boxes that are without meaning,
flexibility, adaptability, interest, natural materials
or any sense of fun and interactivity - in other
words, all the qualities that we associate with life.
Why would we think that we can live in these
artificial boxes that have no aspects that in any
way relate to life as we know it. |
|
Matt
Taylor
Nashville
November 11, 2004

SolutionBox
voice of this document:
ENGINEERING STRATEGY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
|
|
posted:
November 11, 2004
revised:
November 30, 2004
• 20041111.337990.mt • 20041130.645410.mt
•
(note:
this document is about 5% finished)
Copyright© Matt
Taylor, 2004
IP
Statement and Policy
|
|
|